Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
40.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.440.7+54.2% Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) is 54.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.33s32.44s+111.6% Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) is 111.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$5.00 / $25.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itClaude Opus 4.7 (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/claude-opus-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/claude-opus-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill