Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.10
Total cost
$1487
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.426.1−1.1% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 1.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,486.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.10s60.66s+301.7% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 301.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.28 / $4.07
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itGLM-5.1 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/glm-5-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/glm-5-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill