Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GLM-5.3 (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.3 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
34.30
Total cost
$1013
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)GLM-5.3 (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.434.3+29.9% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 29.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,012.50— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.14s31.07s+105.2% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 105.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itGLM-5.3 (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill