Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-4.1 nano

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-4.1 nano. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)GPT-4.1 nanoDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.47.8−70.5% GPT-4.1 nano is 70.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.87s2.86s−79.4% GPT-4.1 nano is 79.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.10 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itGPT-4.1 nano: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/gpt-4-1-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/gpt-4-1-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill