Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) | GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 30.4 | +15.2% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 15.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.14s | 131.52s | +768.7% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 768.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.75 / $14.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/gpt-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/gpt-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill