Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 24.1 | −8.7% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 8.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,524.02 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.14s | 109.06s | +620.3% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 620.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill