Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-6 Astra (High)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-6 Astra (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 50.9 | +92.8% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 92.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $2,925.01 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.87s | 60.20s | +334.0% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 334.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/gpt-6-astra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/gpt-6-astra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill