Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs MiniMax-M2.7

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs MiniMax-M2.7. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)MiniMax-M2.7Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.422.8−13.6% MiniMax-M2.7 is 13.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.33s53.46s+248.7% MiniMax-M2.7 is 248.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itMiniMax-M2.7: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/minimax-m2-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/minimax-m2-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill