Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Mistral Small 3.2

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Mistral Small 3.2. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
MistralMistral Small 3.2Off the frontier
Intelligence
7.00
Total cost
$122
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Mistral Small 3.2Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.47.0−73.5% Mistral Small 3.2 is 73.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$121.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.14s11.35s−25.0% Mistral Small 3.2 is 25.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.07 / $0.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itMistral Small 3.2: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill