Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Mixtral 8x7B Instruct

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Mixtral 8x7B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
MistralMixtral 8x7B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Mixtral 8x7B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.45.1−80.7% Mixtral 8x7B Instruct is 80.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.10s20.76s+37.5% Mixtral 8x7B Instruct is 37.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.45 / $0.70
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itMixtral 8x7B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/mixtral-8x7b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/mixtral-8x7b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill