Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs o4-mini (High)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs o4-mini (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIo4-mini (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)o4-mini (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.416.7−36.7% o4-mini (High) is 36.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.26s28.44s+86.4% o4-mini (High) is 86.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.10 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats ito4-mini (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/o4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/o4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill