Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4 Multimodal InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Phi-4 Multimodal InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.45.8−78.0% Phi-4 Multimodal Inst… is 78.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.11sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.08 / $0.32
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Speech
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itPhi-4 Multimodal Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/phi-4-multimodal · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/phi-4-multimodal?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill