Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.426.7+1.1% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 1.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.10s16.87s+11.7% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 11.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill