Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 32BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Qwen2.5 Instruct 32BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.46.9−73.9% Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B is 73.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.26sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 32B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/qwen2.5-32b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/qwen2.5-32b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill