Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.47.5−71.6% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 71.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.65s3.42s−74.9% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 74.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill