Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Step 3.7 Flash

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.40
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)Step 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.419.5−26.1% Step 3.7 Flash is 26.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.11s18.73s+24.0% Step 3.7 Flash is 24.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill