Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)

Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.90
Total cost
-
AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
42.30
Total cost
$860
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High)Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.942.3+36.9% Claude Opus 5.5 (Low,… is 36.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$860.33— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.41s15.14s+32.7% Claude Opus 5.5 (Low,… is 32.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$4.00 / $20.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itClaude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/claude-opus-5-5-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/claude-opus-5-5-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill