Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.90
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.40
Total cost
$461
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High)DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.911.4−63.1% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 63.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$460.74— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.78s19.76s+67.7% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 67.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$2.00 / $4.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/deepseek-r1-0120 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/deepseek-r1-0120?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill