Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.90
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High)DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.98.4−72.8% DeepSeek R1 Distill Q… is 72.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.11sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill