Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)

Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.90
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High)GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.911.2−63.8% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 63.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.72s32.68s+178.8% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 178.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High): what beats itGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/glm-4-6v-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/glm-4-6v-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill