Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.9 | 43.9 | +42.1% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 42.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $238.53 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.11s | 11.16s | +0.5% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 0.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill