Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs GLM-5 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
40.70
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
21.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)40.721.8−46.4% GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) is 46.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.44s9.04s−72.1% GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) is 72.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.00 / $3.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Max): what beats itGLM-5 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/glm-5-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/glm-5-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill