Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs Jamba 1.6 Large

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs Jamba 1.6 Large. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
40.70
Total cost
-
AI21 LabsJamba 1.6 LargeNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Jamba 1.6 LargeDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)40.76.0−85.3% Jamba 1.6 Large is 85.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)33.94sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Max): what beats itJamba 1.6 Large: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/jamba-1-6-large · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/jamba-1-6-large?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill