Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
40.70
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Ling 3.1 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)40.741.1+1.0% Ling 3.1 Flash is 1.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,014.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)33.59s13.61s−59.5% Ling 3.1 Flash is 59.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Max): what beats itLing 3.1 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill