Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603

Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
40.70
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Max)Step 3.5 Flash 2603Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)40.717.0−58.2% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 58.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)33.94s20.05s−40.9% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 40.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (Max): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash 2603: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill