Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs GLM-5 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 21.8 | −47.8% GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) is 47.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,873.86 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.92s | 9.62s | −73.9% GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) is 73.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.00 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/glm-5-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/glm-5-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill