Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)

Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs GPT-5.2 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
41.80
Total cost
$6874
OpenAIGPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.8 (Max)GPT-5.2 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)41.830.4−27.3% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 27.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$6,873.86Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)36.91s94.34s+155.6% GPT-5.2 (Xhigh) is 155.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.75 / $14.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.8 (Max): what beats itGPT-5.2 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/gpt-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/gpt-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill