Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) by Anthropic or GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs Claude Opus 4.8 (Max): 12.4% more intelligence, 49.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 181.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 47.0 | +12.4% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 12.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,873.86 | $3,464.84 | −49.6% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 49.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.99s | 106.87s | +181.3% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 181.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/gpt-5-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/gpt-5-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill