Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) by Anthropic or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) scores 24.3 points higher (41.8 vs 17.5) but costs 47× as much to run the benchmark ($6874 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 17.5 | −58.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 58.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,873.86 | $145.77 | −97.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 97.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.92s | 24.76s | −32.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 32.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Claude Opus 4.8 (Max): 58.1% less intelligence, 97.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill