Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) by Anthropic or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 4.8 (Max): 8.6% more intelligence, 28.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 45.4 | +8.6% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 8.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,873.86 | $4,934.79 | −28.2% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 28.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.99s | 64.02s | +68.5% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 68.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill