Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
53.60
Total cost
$2172
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.613.7−74.4% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 74.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$2,172.43Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)36.61s6.48s−82.3% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 82.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.56 / $1.68
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): what beats itDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/deepseek-v3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/deepseek-v3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill