Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High)
Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.7 | 28.5 | −44.9% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 44.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,715.98 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.79s | 12.59s | −76.6% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 76.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill