Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.6 | 5.3 | −90.1% Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reas… is 90.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,172.43 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.81s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | — | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/exaone-4-0-1-2b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/exaone-4-0-1-2b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill