Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)

Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
53.60
Total cost
$2172
Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.618.5−65.5% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 65.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$2,172.43Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)33.81s79.51s+135.2% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 135.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.55 / $2.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): what beats itGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/glm-4-6-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/glm-4-6-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill