Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Non-reasoning)

Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)GPT-5.4 nano (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.611.7−78.2% GPT-5.4 nano (Non-rea… is 78.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$2,172.43Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)40.99s3.62s−91.2% GPT-5.4 nano (Non-rea… is 91.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.20 / $1.25
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/gpt-5-4-nano-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/gpt-5-4-nano-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill