Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Ling-2.6-1T

Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Ling-2.6-1T. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
53.60
Total cost
$2172
InclusionAILing-2.6-1TNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Ling-2.6-1TDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.617.0−68.3% Ling-2.6-1T is 68.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$2,172.43Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)33.81sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.30 / $2.50
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback): what beats itLing-2.6-1T: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/ling-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/ling-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill