Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)

Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.66.4−88.1% Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) is 88.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$2,172.43Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)33.81s31.78s−6.0% Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) is 6.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.12 / $0.24
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/qwen3-14b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-high/qwen3-14b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill