Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.3 | 14.9 | −64.8% GLM-4.7-Flash (Reason… is 64.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $860.33 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.48s | 32.05s | +156.8% GLM-4.7-Flash (Reason… is 156.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.07 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/glm-4-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/glm-4-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill