Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-4o (Nov '24)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-4o (Nov '24). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | GPT-4o (Nov '24) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.3 | 8.4 | −80.1% GPT-4o (Nov '24) is 80.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $860.33 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.48s | 3.71s | −70.3% GPT-4o (Nov '24) is 70.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.50 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/gpt-4o · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/gpt-4o?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill