Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
42.30
Total cost
$860
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 72BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)Qwen2.5 Instruct 72BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)42.37.7−81.8% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 81.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$860.33Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.42s22.71s+69.2% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 69.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.47 / $0.49
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback): what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 72B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill