Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,031.27 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.99s | 64.24s | +179.4% Gemma 4 31B (Reasonin… is 179.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.00 / $0.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/gemma-4-31b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/gemma-4-31b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill