Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 7.5 | −85.4% Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reas… is 85.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.83s | 11.87s | −45.6% Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reas… is 45.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill