Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 18.5 | −63.9% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 63.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.83s | 79.13s | +262.5% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 262.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.55 / $2.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/glm-4-6-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/glm-4-6-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill