Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 8.4 | −83.6% GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoni… is 83.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.83s | 8.97s | −58.9% GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoni… is 58.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/glm-4-6v · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/glm-4-6v?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill