Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… scores 7.3 points higher (51.2 vs 43.9) but costs 6.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1627 vs $239; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 43.9, and GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when 43.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 43.9 | −14.3% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 14.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | $238.53 | −85.3% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 85.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.66s | 11.16s | −54.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 54.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 14.3% less intelligence, 85.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 54.7% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill