Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 9.6% less intelligence, 138.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 46.3 | −9.6% Grok 4.7 (High) is 9.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | $3,880.88 | +138.6% Grok 4.7 (High) is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.83s | 26.80s | +22.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 22.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill