Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Ling-2.6-1T

Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Ling-2.6-1T. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
51.20
Total cost
$1627
InclusionAILing-2.6-1TNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Ling-2.6-1TDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)51.217.0−66.8% Ling-2.6-1T is 66.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,626.81Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)20.28sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.30 / $2.50
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): what beats itLing-2.6-1T: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/ling-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/ling-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill