Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… scores 25.2 points higher (51.2 vs 26.0) but costs 7.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1627 vs $231; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 26.0 | −49.2% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 49.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | $231.08 | −85.8% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 85.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.57s | 49.58s | +182.2% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 182.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 49.2% less intelligence, 85.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 182.2% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill