Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)

Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)56.023.3−58.4% Claude Sonnet 4.6 (No… is 58.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$4,056.65Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)127.77s11.12s−91.3% Claude Sonnet 4.6 (No… is 91.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$3.00 / $15.0
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill