Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… scores 21.2 points higher (56.0 vs 34.8) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($4057 vs $1081; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 34.8, and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when 34.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 34.8 | −37.9% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 37.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | $1,081.42 | −73.3% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 73.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 123.06s | 15.37s | −87.5% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 87.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.44 / $1.32 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 37.9% less intelligence, 73.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.5% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/deepseek-v4-flash-vision · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/deepseek-v4-flash-vision?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill